Richmond expected to get a Double-A team next season

Richmond expected to get a Double-A team next season

DEAN HOFFMEYER/TIMES-DISPATCH

July 4th 2008 - The Diamond on the Boulevard.

» 43 Comments | Post a Comment

MORE:
VIDEO: Public Square debates Shockoe ballpark
Ballpark issue is topic of Public Square forum
Ballpark is bad fit for Bottom, activist argues
Businessman is passionate advocate for baseball in Richmond
Give Shockoe Center plan a chance, developer says
Shockoe-stadium foe says plan is bad deal for taxpayers

The Double-A Connecticut Defenders will be allowed to relocate to Richmond even without a long-term plan for where they'll play, the president of the Eastern League said.

Minor League Baseball officials previously expressed reluctance to approving a move without firm plans for a new ballpark.

But Eastern League President Joe McEacharn said Tuesday the league and Minor League Baseball have worked jointly on the Richmond situation and together will approve the relocation after the purchase of the Defenders by Richmond Baseball Club LC for a projected $15 million.

"I do not expect the long-term stadium issue to come to a head and be resolved in time for us to include that in our process," said McEacharn, who visited Richmond this week.

RBC will close a deal to acquire the minor-league franchise any day, according to McEacharn and RBC Chairman Bryan Bostic. Bostic's group had planned to buy the Defenders this spring and on Tuesday described the deal as imminent.

Not having a long-term ballpark solution at this time "is not going to preclude us from acquiring a team and having it play in Richmond," Bostic said Tuesday. "But clearly, The Diamond is not a long-term solution. . . . This community must address the issue."

Mayor Dwight C. Jones still is reviewing a proposal for Shockoe Center, a $318 million development in Shockoe Bottom in downtown Richmond that would include a $60 million ballpark, as well as offices, hotels, restaurants and other uses.

Jones' administration expects to release by Monday a report by consultants Davenport & Co. on the financial viability of Shockoe Center. The city is spending $100,000 for the study.

Yesterday, Jones' office had no comment when asked about the possibility of a relocation being approved without a ballpark plan in place.

Jones was one of several city officials who attended but did not speak at Tuesday's spirited Public Square debate on a ballpark for the Bottom, organized by the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

A majority of the speakers at the Public Square, which drew a standing-room-only crowd of 230 people to The Times-Dispatch's downtown offices, criticized the idea. Some speakers cited failed projects such as the 6th Street Marketplace.

Councilman Bruce W. Tyler, who attended the debate, said he's relieved that Richmond may get a team before a decision on a new ballpark is made.

"I'm glad to hear that they have some flexibility because we may need it," he said.

Tyler said he won't vote on Shockoe Center because of a conflict of interest. His architectural firm, Baskervill, does work for Highwoods Properties, which is the master developer for Shockoe Center.

Councilman E. Martin Jewell, who attended part of Tuesday's debate, said the developers make a "pretty compelling argument" that Shockoe Center would spur development in the Bottom.

Without the project, "it would take eons to bring that whole area to its full capacity," he said.

At the same time, Jewell said the city needs to make sure the ballpark won't backfire financially on taxpayers and that the new team will garner regional support.

The Defenders, who are contractually bound to be a San Francisco Giants affiliate through next season, would relocate to The Diamond for next season. They currently play in Norwich, Conn.

Scott Poley, the vice president for legal affairs/general counsel for Minor League Baseball, said yesterday that he could not determine whether RBC's relocation application will be approved, because nothing has been filed.

Highwoods Properties has asked the Jones administration to issue a letter of intent for Shockoe Center by Aug. 1 that would allow the company to seek other commitments for the project.

"We're not going to assume anything, other than we will have a site at The Diamond," McEacharn said. "The team is going to make some necessary improvements to satisfy our player needs, satisfy their business needs, and we're comfortable with the condition of the field and the lights and whatnot.

"Again, we'll reiterate, it's not a long-term solution."

The Diamond, former home of the Triple-A Richmond Braves, is where the new Double-A team would play for at least the next two seasons, while another ballpark is built. The Diamond, built for $8 million, opened in 1985.

McEacharn said Eastern League owners are excited about the addition of Richmond, which will be the southernmost outpost in the 12-team league. In addition to the Defenders, the league includes teams in Akron, Ohio; Altoona, Pa.; Binghamton, N.Y.; Bowie, Md.; Erie, Pa.; Harrisburg, Pa.; New Britain, Conn.; Manchester, N.H.; Portland, Maine; Reading, Pa.; and Trenton, N.J.



Contact John O'Connor at (804) 649-6233 or .

Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by R on May 14, 2009 at 3:06 pm

Dave:

I have and I use the Greyhound station. I bring hand sanitizer.


It remains that a Boulevard stadium project, where a stadium site already exists, comes to us without wasted efforts. Everything is in place for renewal. That’s one foot in the door.

Flag Comment Posted by TheRightChoice on May 14, 2009 at 3:04 pm

Kudos to all the people who have been being positive and enthusiastic about baseball coming back.  The critics do not have any knowledge of what is being private and what is being taxed.  Half the critics don’t even come downtown for anything. I’m glad to see support from people like myself that see’s an opportunity for Richmond. Let the haters stay in their box and bring on the Eastern League!

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on May 14, 2009 at 1:48 pm

“a better location could not be giftwrapped”....um, have you seen the greyhound station?

Flag Comment Posted by OutOfLeftField on May 14, 2009 at 1:48 pm

I have not seen anything that demonstrates a “majority” of either opinion. Just because the RTD meeting had many opposed doesn’t mean that ALL of Richmond feels the same way, especially when the majority of those speaking against the stadium proposal were of a similar age bracket. And especially when opposition to ideas is generally louder than support. Those who support or those who don’t care often simply state “Yes” or “whatever,“ but don’t go out of their way to fight with a bunch of people who in many cases are NIMBYs.

What research was involved in your determination of “majority”?

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on May 14, 2009 at 1:43 pm

everyone let’s argue against a stadium downtown so we can lose this team too.  this town needs to wake up if it’s ever going to stop coming up from being behind.  a downtown stadium is the only answer for a true entertainment venue where people can do things pre and post game.  putting it in the burbs is a joke - downtown shortpump is an oxymoron.  it’s time to reinvest in downtown…we live in Richmond, not henrico, chesterfield, etc.  if boarded up buildings and strip clubs are considered too historic to tear down in order to build the park, then we are living in bizarro world.

Flag Comment Posted by citycynic on May 14, 2009 at 1:30 pm

wr70beh: Immature name calling aside, you make my point for me. I welcome baseball - just not to the Bottom at an enormous cost to taxpayers at a time when the economy is is the toilet and where the majority of citizens don’t want it (repeat: the majority, not just me; try actually reading my post and do the research). Grow up.

Flag Comment Posted by R on May 14, 2009 at 1:28 pm

RE: wr70beh

But to level several city blocks when a stadium site ALREADY exists…

What’s the argument against building/renovating over at the Diamond again? It’s too reasonable?

Flag Comment Posted by Hate_Richmond on May 14, 2009 at 1:14 pm

Citycynic: give it up. Baseball is coming to the city whether you like it or not. A new stadium is going to be built in this city even though you oppose it. Quit trying to oppose this for the sake of opposing. It’s troglodytes like you that give this city a bad name.

Flag Comment Posted by citycynic on May 14, 2009 at 12:11 pm

My God - the majority of people at the forum opposed the Bottom plan and the mayor didn’t even have the guts to address the “spirited” discussion. Once and for all - Richmond does not want, not will they support, this project. And once and for all - it will NOT be privately funded because the tax revenue the developer keeps insisting will magically result from all of the new businesses that will magically appear is a pipe dream along the lines of the visitors who have still failed to magically appear at the Convention Center. And finally, fans did not stop supporting Richmond baseball because of the condition of the Diamond. Attendance dropped because there was little or no PR for the games and because the team was losing. If you read the posts and listen to the public forums, the vast majority of fans who regularly attended games at the Diamond oppose the Bottom plan. Yet this proposal is being crammed down the taxpayers throats anyway. Somebody please, please hit the brakes! No baseball in the Bottom!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by mslf500 on May 14, 2009 at 11:53 am

I think the stadium design is supposed to address some of the flooding issues from the CSO just as the canal was built as a part of the solution for the giant CSO underneath it.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement